Julie Kunstler, Senior Principal Analyst, Broadband Access, Omdia

PON — Innovation for Now and the Future

Industry Voices Trending
Julie Kunstler Headshot
Title slide that says, “PON innovation for now and the future: A Webinar by Omdia.”

Service providers, learn what PON-based networks can do for you

In this webinar co-presented by Omdia and Juniper Networks, you’ll discover innovative approaches to bringing PON (passive optical network) into the metro network and how PON’s fiber-efficient topology has evolved to help lower operating costs and streamline operations and management. 

Show more

You’ll learn

  • Market trends in the PON equipment market 

  • Why metro operators are pursuing PON in growing numbers 

  • PON’s architectures, applications, and how it seamlessly integrates with metro resources 

Who is this for?

Network Professionals Business Leaders

Host

Julie Kunstler Headshot
Julie Kunstler
Senior Principal Analyst, Broadband Access, Omdia

Guest speakers

Anisha Anil Daman
Product Manager, Juniper Networks
Robert Damon
Senior Consulting Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks
Transcript

0:05 hello everyone and welcome to this latest webinar from amdia brought to you by informatec

0:11 today's topic is pawn innovation for now in the future

0:17 we will be discussing innovative approaches to bringing pawn into the metro network

0:23 our webinar is co-presented by amdia and our partner juniper networks

0:28 my name is julie kunsler and i'm chief analyst at amdia focusing on broadband access infrastructure i want to thank

0:35 everyone for joining us

0:40 today we are joined by anisha and neil domani product manager with juniper networks and robert damon senior

0:47 consulting sales engineer with juniper networks welcome we are honored to have you with

0:52 us today now let's get things started with the presentation

0:59 and we're going to begin with market trends and i want to spend a few minutes highlighting

1:04 some market trends in the pond equipment market the first

1:10 is looking at measuring pond success pond is the fiber access technology of

1:16 choice we've seen very strong growth in pondequit in the pond equipment market

1:21 there's been deployments by a wide range of operator types including integrated

1:27 fixed only and even mobile only we've seen this in all regions

1:32 china is no longer dominating consumption of the global market as numero numerous operators in europe

1:39 the middle east asia pacific north america south america

1:45 and africa are building fiber access networks using pond in addition there is very strong

1:50 movement to next gen pond and in some regions next gen pond has begun to dominate

1:56 networks next gen pond is supporting traffic growth from residential enterprises and

2:03 ex-hall transport vendors are entering the ecosystem with

2:09 innovative approaches bringing access to existing solutions and strengths such as

2:14 adding access to switching and routing and adding adding pawn features and functions into the bng platforms

2:25 pond has been evolving from what was considered a best efforts technology for fiber to the home

2:32 and fiber to the building to being able to handle very different types of traffic in

2:38 different types of applications it is the underlying technology for what we're calling the unified fiber access

2:46 networks trying to take advantage of that optical distribution network build and using it

2:52 for many different types of applications while not all traffic will be put onto a

2:57 pond network the underlying odn can support different types of customers and

3:02 requirements the rapid adoption of 10g and specifically

3:08 xgs pond 10g symmetrical gpon and the usapun for residential and

3:14 non-residential is attracting new approaches to pond technology and new vendors

3:21 which brings us to juniper networks

3:27 over to you and nisha who will talk about the problems and challenges in the pan system

3:35 thank you julie so as julie mentioned vendors are entering the pawn space and

3:41 next generation pawn is dominating different use cases the important question is why are they

3:46 doing this with the increase of work from home home schooling due to covert the demand for

3:52 high speed services has increased which essentially means that the traffic in metro space is growing fast in

4:00 situations like this the operators are looking for a solution that provide

4:05 increased speeds easy to scale options and efficient parts to access the services

4:11 let us explore the options available for last mile technology option one is ethernet to home which is

4:19 a little complex to deploy option two dsl but operators are looking for a

4:24 little bit of more faster solution three is cable technology

4:30 but the requirement is very different from the cable technology five 5g which is

4:36 work in progress right so essentially i understand the requirement is a nice niche of ethernet home and cable uh

4:45 options from an operator's point of view there is also an increased competition that you see you see a landmark satellite

4:52 offering google fiber entering the space and of course 5g trying to solve this

4:58 problem however i think pawn fits the bill much better

5:03 pawn is simpler to deploy you just need a few splitters and you can now deploy 10g pawn which provides loads of

5:09 bandwidth even before we go into more details of the options which will be covered by

5:15 robert let's take a look at a typical pawn deployment a typical

5:20 pawn deployment has a bunch of onus at the access layer

5:26 connected to a dedicated old shelf which in turn is connected to an aggregation platform and then to a

5:33 subscriber access now there are some challenges here in case of a green field

5:38 you are essentially looking for an economical simple and fast time to market

5:44 and in case of a brown field you want to upgrade from 10 gig to 10 gig from existing g pawn e pawn

5:52 network that is one gig or 2.5 gig if you're looking to do an upgrade from one

5:58 gig or 2.5 to 10k in this scenario what you must you will

6:03 have to do is you will have to upgrade your transport connections ont's or access switches and your old

6:10 shelves you must also scale your old uplink from 10 gig to 100k you must take into

6:15 consideration the power in space calculation and also deal with vendor lock emissions

6:21 in a nutshell in case of a brownfield deployment you must consider an entire end-to-end ecosystem while upgrading

6:29 good news is there is an innovative approach available to avoid all the hassles

6:35 robert will walk us through it in detail robert over to you

6:42 thank you anisha you know the latest innovation in pond has been the collapsing of the optical line terminal

6:48 or the olt into a small form factor pluggable optic this is allowing for the installation

6:54 and router ports making a pond network a direct part of the access layer

6:59 by leveraging advanced silicon processes a complete system on can chip containing the intelligence to bridge xgs or 10 gig

7:07 depon directly to ethernet is contained in an sfp plus optic

7:13 this evolutionary design distributes the olt functionality reducing failure impacts and creating a

7:21 port based scalable model this also serves as a form factor to allow for future growth as 25 gigapawn

7:29 and 50 gig pond become standard and developed in the future

7:34 using the same plugable form factor

7:41 the result is the eliminated of the specialized pawn shelf the optics and the fiber interconnects

7:48 the access router now instead of a single purpose chassis full of line cards this allows pawn

7:55 services to be delivered the same way as direct internet access mobile backhaul or wan services

8:03 a single access device can be used for residential commercial and enterprise applications

8:09 no longer limiting pond to just residential broadband julie i believe you have a question for

8:16 the audience regarding this yes i do so we have one poll question here

8:24 which is are you using or are you considering the use of pawn infrastructure for

8:29 non-residential customers um or applications so we'd really appreciate your answer to this poll

8:35 question and we'll have the answers in just a couple of seconds here

8:49 wow so this is uh this is great news in at least in my opinion

8:54 as an analyst that we are seeing that everyone in the audience is either using pawn for

9:00 non-residential or at least considering it um so robert back to you

9:08 thank you julia yeah interesting response on that and remind the audience just to if you do have questions please

9:13 submit them and yes looking at that as far as being able to do non-residential applications

9:19 having a modular design really will play and to be able to have put pawn in places that you haven't before

9:26 you know when we compare this model modular olt to traditional pond deployments we see several advantages

9:34 by creating this open environment the all or nothing model with a single vendor or technology is eliminated

9:41 this gives you the ability to rapidly build a best debris design with the right onu deployment for the right

9:46 service um so can you can i stop you for one second here and

9:52 can you expand a little bit regarding easing into pon you know this seems important especially for network

9:59 operators that have previously focused on active ethernet

10:05 sure julie you know and this modular design allows for an easier deployment upon to the network by

10:10 by simply just adding this sfp olt to an existing router port

10:15 services can be quickly deployed as market demands arise even if there are current slower speed

10:21 pawn deployments the module olt allows for a 10 gig pond to be added without

10:26 network wide upgrades as a result you'll be quickly able to

10:32 quickly deploy pawn equipment avoid or eliminate specialized hardware

10:37 saving precious space or power and deploy more services no matter what the less mild technology is used

10:44 when you compare 10 gig pond to one gig active ethernet you can immediately see the benefits and saved ports having a

10:52 design that allows you to deploy pawn alongside of the active ethernet deployment on the same platform also

10:58 gives the operator even greater flexibility but can we focus for a moment on power

11:06 because there's tremendous focus on carbon neutral you know historically regulators have really focused on

11:13 the con the customer promise side right bringing down or encouraging operators to lower

11:19 the power consumption of devices in the home because after all the regulators are really there to protect the the

11:26 subscriber the consumer so i'm interested if you can elaborate a little bit more

11:32 on how your approach helps to bring down energy usage

11:38 that's a great point julia and you know power consumption has become a forefront in network design

11:44 you know newer devices have greatly reduced the power per gigabit when you eliminate it you know

11:51 in the equipment you know with the faster speed equipment with the newer designs but when you eliminate the

11:57 additional processors line cards and fans of a dedicated olt shelf you can

12:02 see that there's going to be a savings that are going to be able to achieve in the central office or in the remote cabinet

12:09 this gives you also gives you the ability to reduce the size of the power plant required the backup power the

12:16 batteries required as well as the cooling equipment and or at least costly time-consuming

12:22 upgrades to those devices when you go to upgrade those one other thing to note is that with the

12:28 elimination of the olt shelf you no longer need the high speed up links to

12:33 the access router this frees up additional ports increases reliability

12:38 and reduces cost in both the optic cost as well as the power required to be able to do that

12:48 i want to talk a little bit about how this would work in a deployment model

12:56 if we look at the pawn architecture in the network we can see uh you know this is a typical

13:01 service deployment showing serving a wide range of customers both residential and commercial

13:07 you know olts are generally deployed in a head-headed or central office environment or in a remote cabinet or on

13:12 a pole this flexibility allows for the distance the customer to the olt to be minimized

13:19 one of pond's main advantage is using a single shared fiber design saving resources as a single olt port can serve

13:26 many customers pond standards can support up to 128 customers on a single port

13:33 but julie i think you're seeing something different in the model of how customers are deploying time today

13:39 yes that's correct so at one time pawn infrastructure and here

13:45 we're really talking about the underlying odn was very standardized

13:50 in the beginning of pon in the beginning of epon and gpon we were really looking

13:56 mostly at 1 by 64 splits sometimes 1 by 32 split

14:01 but today i'm seeing a much wider variety there's some overbuilders that have even done one by

14:08 thirty 132 um sorry 128

14:13 in an attempt to cover to really like a land grab get as much out there get as much fiber deployed as possible own that

14:20 fiber pipe like a land grab situation i've also

14:25 seen much lower split ratios one by sixteen one by eight

14:31 and some analysis has shown that even one by four can be much more

14:37 economical than a point-to-point active ethernet approach so there's a lot of

14:42 variety out there and that's part of why the flexibility flexible approaches have become

14:48 so important because different operators have very different strategies on what they're trying to achieve such as

14:54 coverage versus a much bigger pipe for example

15:01 well thank you julie and you know i've kind of seen the same thing in my talks with customers where maybe you know even

15:06 though the pawn standards say one one by 128 really you know focusing in on one by 32

15:12 or smaller or at least the ability to further break that down as you get customer demands like you say building

15:20 it out for the land grab model where you do uh you can deploy it with a one by twenty one twenty eight

15:26 and then be able to scale that down as you start adding customers as servers and that's where having this module ot

15:32 is nice because you're not stranding olt ports out there in advance you're adding them as the customer demand grows

15:39 so that really helps you out with that and then you know since the same device could be used for

15:44 multiple services it's easy to add the olt anywhere you know since uh 10 gig pond you know

15:51 amplifies the bandwidth fundamentals upon you know places where you've been able to use pawn

15:57 haven't used pawn before because of the lower bandwidth it really gives you the ability to use that and you brought up

16:04 the point about a one by four split you know that really becomes a great alternative to active ethernet

16:10 deployments and it's uh really also being able to see pond being used in applications that

16:16 are not residential in the commercial space as well and this is well we're seeing

16:22 um you know places like inside buildings where you know maybe riser fiber is a premium or

16:29 even within in campus environments it really kind of has those plays and it's also important to note that you

16:36 know the pond infrastructure that's out there in the in the physical plan we're talking about the splitters and uh the

16:43 combiners and uh all those gear this is the same infrastructure that's used for one gig pond is the same infrastructure

16:50 that's used for 10 gig pond and will be used before these passive devices are the same low

16:56 cost devices that we've been used today so nothing special has to change in the outside plant to make this

17:02 but as you're seeing as you were saying julie that reducing the the split counts is really some of the models that we're

17:08 seeing these providers go to you know um with the um

17:14 modular ot you can also you know you the explosion of iot private 5g

17:19 hospitality remote learning as anisha mentioned and high-speed wi-fi have all driven higher demands and locations

17:25 where pond has not traditionally been looked at as a feasible choice but with 10 gig pond it really becomes a

17:32 decision point that can be used for deploying your network

17:40 as you can see the applications for pond are far-reaching the innovation of the modular pond olt

17:46 allows for common ip service fabric to be deployed for all services

17:52 you know so i mean you can see here there's a whole lot of different types of services that can be offered with pond

18:00 so if i can if i can ask a question here um you know how can an operator manage

18:05 multiple applications on a single pond network and i think specifically how does

18:10 juniper's approach support this objective how does this fit into the

18:18 your existing management system for example

18:24 well sure well one other that's a great question you know one of the things by creating a common ip fabric

18:31 and this this ib fabric you know lives at the heart of um you know where

18:36 you know things that have been deployed in service provider networks and even in enterprise networks for a while

18:43 you can have a streamlight approach for all applications allowing for simplified engineering as

18:49 you reduce the complexities of separate networks multiple devices a myriad of routing protocols the

18:56 ability to move seamless between direct fiber active ethernet or pawn allowing for adaptations because now pawn is

19:04 treated just like another access in the network it's uh you know it's an interface in

19:09 the device so there's really no way a difference in how you would treat a direct directly connected mobile

19:16 backhaul service versus a pawn access side or versus a another site plugged

19:22 into the router because now everything is shown is brought up to the router level and you're able to apply the qos

19:30 the quality of service models apply sla parameters and be able to deliver these seamlessly and

19:37 effortlessly no matter how the the network evolves you know one of the key requirements in

19:43 offering pond services is subscriber management this cloud metro design allows for

19:48 centralized deployment of the broadband network gateway or bng device

19:53 with the flexibility of using technologies like evpn over mpls to connect to the

19:59 customer services this allows for simple management i p address application

20:05 if you need to add services like network address translation or nat and even the law enforcement uh

20:12 compliance services that you need to do if you're providing residential services

20:17 as you can see by having this simple cloud metro design you can create a scalable design as you can keep adding

20:24 nodes you can keep increasing speeds from you know 10 gig to 100 gig to now 400 gig

20:30 and be able to deploy a high high capacity platforms that have both pawn

20:35 and non-pond services if you look at the uh you know the crowd

20:42 cloud metro as a whole and what this means the net networks and how you know

20:47 by pulling pawn into this really gives it is an innovation it's the converged network for use all

20:53 use cases a cloud metro converges all metro use cases whether it be residential business

21:01 mobile backhaul transport onto a single converged architecture with a single operational

21:08 model network operators can also apply special treatment to different traffic and service types

21:14 under different service level agreements slas uh over the same infrastructure

21:20 by leveraging this a cloud metro networking intelligently steered traffic to the right physical or virtual

21:26 resource in the most efficient way to optimize the user experience

21:31 it optimizes capacity and utilization with control plane and user plane separation

21:37 or cups and modern traffic engineering protocols whether it's commercial traffic that

21:42 gets handed off directly to the internet subscriber traffic needing services from the bng

21:48 order deployment of local caching and services the cloud metro provides an intuitive and scalable framework

21:59 i think anisha was going to like to go through juniper's approach to howard handling pond networking

22:06 hey thanks robert so the unified pawn is supported by

22:11 juniper's multi-service a65400 series which also supports advanced metro use

22:18 cases so these are access aggregation platforms that combine one gig and 10k

22:24 client services with hundred gig uplinks including 100 and 200 gig

22:30 dwdm options for packet optical convergence flexibility

22:35 as robert mentioned the 10g pawn olt in our solution is treated as a standard

22:40 ethernet port within the acx this greatly simplifies the provisioning required for the solution

22:48 the standard junos features and functionalities are leveraged to provide both the control plane and data plane in

22:54 japan at jonathan what we have combined the acx router with the

23:01 smart pluggable revolutionary olt which comes in an ssd plus form factor so this

23:07 eliminates the old shelf helps tackle the power and space constraint and reduces the solution from

23:14 a toolbox solution to a one box solution the old supports selectability of for

23:20 both 10 gig sjx phone or 10g epom along with the management platform to

23:26 control and provision all functions on the pawn network leveraging the pluggable ssp plus form

23:32 factor we create scalable design that allows your receipts to provide multiple services like mobile.com

23:39 direct internet access along with on services thus eliminating the need of any

23:44 specialized services or separate network we have integrated the pawn controller into junos so the operators can take

23:52 advantage of juno's operating system juniper bngs paragon automation

23:57 and more as they add 10g spawn offerings to their service portfolios

24:02 it also interrupts with third-party pond distribution equipment thus avoiding uh all the vendor lock-in

24:09 issues we have a micro climate management system the ncms it is a single page web

24:16 application which provides graphical user interface for provisioning and managing the pawn network

24:23 with npms users can define templates for standard service deliveries easily

24:28 onboard the olts and onus create end-to-end services on the pawn networks manage the orts and onus in

24:36 network including firmware management and monitor the pawn network and collect details of network health and fma

24:43 compliance there is also a netcon server that provides direct provisioning over

24:49 standard space interface through the mcms gui a user can select

24:54 and when you add the endpoint and define a service based on a fully customized template

25:00 to summarize juniper's unified pond delivers a high density standard based pluggable

25:06 architecture combining an integrated and consolidated 10g pawn olt transceiver

25:12 and the pond management solution with the acs universal metro router

25:17 the combination of an open design allows the use of a large ecosystem of third-party onu vendors eliminating the

25:24 access of access vendor locking issues and the bng with advanced subscriber

25:31 management features gives the the pawn network access and the metro access aggregation routing

25:37 capability for a complete converged access solution so this is a complete converse active solution that you're

25:42 looking at so isn't it exciting julie what are your thoughts on this one

25:50 yeah so one clearly one of the goals is to try to converge the access network

25:57 you know we've seen it at the services level right where we've seen operators either integrated operators

26:06 or fixed-only operators who then become mvnos you know virtual mobile operators

26:12 offer voice services data services video

26:17 services and by voice you know whether you're at home or or on the mobile

26:22 network what's taken much longer in my opinion is the convergence of the access network layer and this is becoming more

26:30 and more critical given the growth in traffic and the need for operators

26:36 to control their costs both capex and opex

26:41 and this is clearly one of the advantages of of the pond technology is the ability to to bring down the cost

26:48 by reusing that network you know the cost of the pond network is really in building out that infrastructure the

26:54 construction project whether it's buried fiber cabling or overhead so why not

27:00 reuse that network for as much as much as possible um you know and then oops sorry and this

27:06 leads to the conclusion slide that i have which is that pan and here we're talking

27:12 specifically about tdm pond which is what has been so incredibly successful

27:17 in terms of acceptance adoption deployments upgrades you know it really

27:23 has evolved enabling capex and optic savings and providing flexibility to different

27:29 kinds of broadband service providers you know higher and higher bandwidth we've

27:34 seen the movement from you know ippon to tenji ippon from gpon to xgs

27:40 jupon more and more around 25g there have been announcements

27:45 this year about 25g live networks and a lot of testing going

27:50 on and certainly in the future we expect to see 50g we've even heard about 100g

27:57 lab testing it's gone upon itself has really gone beyond best efforts supporting

28:03 non-residential subscribers and applications and becomes a unifying access technology

28:09 and being able to bring access into the metro and taking advantage of a lot of the metro capabilities

28:16 that the metro network providers vendors have given to their to their customers

28:21 the service providers so it's really a lot of development that we've seen over the last years and that we're going to

28:28 continue to see you know given the very successful role that pond has plenty upon technology has

28:34 played and now i want to move to q a we've gotten in

28:40 really a lot of questions please keep submitting them as mentioned if we don't get to all of

28:46 them now we will certainly we keep them and juniper will be happy to answer the ones

28:53 that that we don't get to live so one of the questions that that's come

28:59 in a good bit is juniper has focused on the olt side so

29:05 how do you ensure that there will be enough ont onu vendors

29:11 for your customers to use with your olt solution

29:20 okay yeah um and that's a great question julie and that's a one of the things

29:26 that's been a differentiator is our approach to looking at pond in an

29:31 open environment and that really kind of leads to how junipers approach routing in general and

29:36 most of our products is open standards and creating the market for it we've already seen

29:43 several vendors in the market that are producing the ont onu devices out there

29:48 ranging from traditional uh simple onus to full function gateways that

29:55 support features all the way up to like wi-fi six and you know by following the standards

30:01 that these are easily onboarded onto our system and we've we've got a pretty large array

30:07 of uh ones that we've already interoperated with ones that we're in field tests with and ones that we have um you know that

30:14 we're working with customers to deploy we are seeing quite a bit more uh uptick

30:20 and demand as far as on the rfp side of xgs pawn deployments we're seeing this

30:26 as being coming the predominant standard and this is what we're seeing a lot of the onu vendors support even though they

30:33 have the capability of doing epon we're seeing xgs pawn being the the

30:38 leader right now at this time for 10 gig pond deployments and so it's uh you know that that

30:45 coupled with uh you know the open system and the onboarding side with the vendors it really

30:52 we're not concerned with you know not having the far end devices on there in the best breed of approach

31:00 yeah thank you so as an analyst in this market segment let me add

31:06 a little bit here about pawn and what what i'm seeing so in the second quarter of this year

31:14 we already saw in north america xgs pawn

31:19 shipments almost match those of g pawn so there's been very rapid adoption of

31:25 xgs pawn olts and here i'm talking on the olt side we expect the onts to are

31:31 happening next gen o and t is specifically xgso and ts but certainly

31:36 on the network side we've already seen the movement a very strong adoption of xgs pawn it's

31:42 simply there's a couple of reasons why one is that it's stable

31:48 there's numerous vendors supporting it it's commercialized and there's been

31:54 a lot of lab trials done a lot of live networks

31:59 deployments done so there's a lot of confidence that xgs is mature

32:05 second the prices are coming down and so if an operator who's trying to decide between gpon

32:11 and xgs pawn for five times the downstream

32:16 and eight times the upstream because we have to remember that g pawn is 2.5 over 1.25 so for tremendous bandwidth

32:25 growth or capabilities you're not paying um eight times for xgs pawn equipment

32:33 so the many operators that have not yet begun to deploy pond networks and we're

32:38 definitely seeing this with the overbuilders and with some of the even incumbents who

32:44 have been slower to build out the pond networks some of them are beginning with only xgs pawn

32:51 if they're if they're telcos a few cable operators are doing the same with 10g epon

32:57 but certainly for those that are looking at g-pan we've seen a lot go with with xgs and

33:04 with the momentum of xgs pawn shipments on for the network side you know whether

33:11 it's a central office or a head end if it's a cable or in a distributed environment

33:17 um so smaller let's say olt solutions to be distributed out into the to the field

33:24 the momentum is there the price points have come down significantly and consequently we're seeing we're

33:31 seeing rapid adoption outside of china it's almost only xgs pawn

33:37 and that's because the operators really want to see the symmetrical capabilities to support

33:44 a lot of enterprise services and exhaust transport

33:49 so another question that has a question that's come in from several different

33:55 people is if you can talk a little bit more juniper about the unified ip fabric

34:01 you know what does this approach really enable me to do in terms of convergence you know you talked about it a little

34:07 bit during your presentation but if you can go into more detail i think it would you know answer

34:14 probably 10 of the questions that we've gotten in around that

34:21 that's great i don't know anisha would you like to uh

34:26 um you can go ahead with that one drop it not a problem no i um yeah and you're

34:32 right there were several questions on that and and it is great about that is you know one of the things that when you

34:38 look at the way you know traditional networks have been built out maybe with some sort of

34:43 ethernet ring protection or layer 2 type of side or wdm the ability of having an ip fabric and

34:51 taking advantage of what we're seeing with 400 gig gig links now and the capability of the

34:57 platforms and then the simplification of protocols things like segment routing uh you know

35:05 mpls over segment running being able to use for traffic engineering to be able not to have to have reserve bandwidth

35:11 and being able to create this ip fabric gives you a model that you can you know

35:17 almost like the shampoo bottle and lather rinse and repeat you can actually create the same model to

35:23 for deploying services across your entire network you know the edge device now can

35:29 actually pick up the what if you're deploying enterprise services and or if you're deploying you know

35:35 mobile back call or if you're doing other types of services at the edge the ip the common ip fabric

35:41 makes it easy for you as an operator for training for management for deployment

35:47 to be able to have one common protocol one common set on there and unless this is really what lends it

35:53 into having pond go into places where pond hasn't gone before with residential side

35:58 whether it's using for iot devices where you're using pond to aggregate up from outside locations

36:05 whether it's in in different buildings or whether it's you know for hospitality

36:10 applications we're seeing quite a bit in the campus market looking at for uh in

36:16 for dorm room or even remote building uh sides it's a uh there's quite a bit

36:22 things that by having this you know your configuration of the device at the edge you don't have to put a special device

36:29 for business services you're not putting a specialized device for residential services you're having a common

36:34 transport side and you're elevating your transport to this ip service fabric

36:42 so what if i can just add on a question for you robert um

36:48 about there being a traffic jam and at the metro level

36:54 yeah and there is i mean if you look at where the growth is uh you know the you know i i one of the things i like to you

37:01 know show the chart is of um you know the metro is where the pressure's at the metro is seeing the yeah as you start

37:08 upgrading for the links you're the metro is the first place to feel the pressure

37:14 it's uh you know that's and by using uh an ip fabric versus using traditional

37:20 layer two transports you're eliminating links that are blocked for you know for

37:25 ring for loop protection and being able to fully use the bandwidth

37:30 also by enabling uh protocols like segment routing you can now take advantage of traffic engineering you can

37:37 actually have your low latency high bandwidth services take the most expressed path through the fabric and

37:44 being able to spread the best effort traffic along other links in the network

37:49 this will allow you to take full advantage of your network before you do costly upgrades of adding links or

37:54 pulling new fiber great thanks

38:00 another question is around coexistence so what do you say to an operator

38:06 who's already deployed you know either one gig epon or 2.5 gig

38:12 g-pawn how how can they work with um juniper solution here

38:21 and that's a great question julia i mean we get that quite a bit because you know the solution that we have is 10

38:27 gig symmetrical pond with whether it be 10 gig epon or xgs pawn

38:33 so uh one of the the nice things that they've done in the standards bodies is that

38:39 these uh services use different wavelengths on the optical spectrum

38:45 so by using what's called a coexistence device that can be combined these

38:50 traditional one one gig two and a half gig pond with 10 gig pond you can

38:55 actually run these services over the same fiber now uh what we've seen is that uh you

39:02 know with the deployment of our solution is that most people are looking to cap

39:08 their current one gig uh two and a half gig pond investments or their separate olt shelves so by using these external

39:16 uh coexistence devices it allows you to seamlessly you know add these services

39:21 on there on the same fiber tree and as well as being able once you migrated customers to 10 gig services to

39:28 roll them over and remove the coexistence device from the network

39:36 so their upgrade

39:41 problem today um efficiently and and then give them room

39:48 it sounds like there's an efficient way that you can help them here if i'm understanding this correctly

39:54 yes yes and by doing this it allows you know to be able to pick and choose where

40:00 you do your upgrades you know lots of times view it's easy to say we're going to deploy new markets with the existing

40:05 technology but maybe you do have a you know a customer along the network

40:11 maybe maybe a business customer or some of your higher end customers that you want to provide a higher speed service

40:18 to by using this you can you can layer on top of the existing pawn network and

40:23 be able to upgrade select customers on there and leave the ones that you have on there and maintain the investments

40:29 you have in your your legacy gpon network

40:34 yeah that's that's really important right so you met you both of you touched on a

40:42 topic that i think is extremely important that once you move outside of residential

40:48 you get into a lot of questions around reliability security slas

40:55 you know typically as residential users most residential users don't

41:00 don't have slas and would not be willing to pay for any type of sla in a service level agreement or

41:08 you know promise of a fix within a certain amount of time or a payment if that doesn't happen so i'm interested

41:16 for you to go into a little bit more detail on how you can insure

41:22 slas because this is one of the key from our findings from surveys with service providers and

41:28 you know yes they may be considering the use of pawn beyond residential but then they raise a lot of a lot of questions

41:35 and one of them is around well can you still give me an sla how are you going to monitor that sla

41:41 what's that lsla going to be based

41:47 i don't on nisha if you want to touch on active insurance yeah yeah definitely so uh

41:54 essentially we have the mtms system right and uh that it will help us

42:00 monitor the old we know and use and check get all the network health and ensure that

42:06 the sla compliance is in place along with that with the fact that the phone controller is integrated on two nodes uh

42:13 we have an entire bigger paragon automation suite that takes care of the

42:18 sla parts right so we definitely have product lines in place uh that are taking care of this

42:26 sla demand right like ask um

42:31 if it's all dead like if you look at it from the solution end to end point of view right uh which i don't know robert

42:37 if you have more details um that you'd like to share um sure sure i mean and julia i know you

42:43 mentioned that you know customers residential customers aren't paying don't want to pay for an sla type of service but it's also

42:51 important to note that with a lot of the the recent funding rounds for projects like rural broadband and

42:58 being able to increase residential services there are requirements from the fcc and other agencies that you maintain

43:06 a certain performance and latency so it is important to monitor those and as nisha mentioned that the the

43:13 ability to do this is in the mat in the ability to gather statistics and being able to rather historic

43:20 statistics and being able to produce those in reports so it's uh it's key and now she touched

43:26 on the fact that our uh the microclimate management system is gathering these

43:31 stats and there's lots of stats that you can gather from both the olt and the onus to be able to ensure that you

43:38 actually are delivering the customer experience that they're paying for

43:43 [Music] great thank you so there's um

43:49 an interesting question here our current pond provider is challenged

43:54 interoperating with mpls services as a leader in mpls does the juniper

44:00 solution allow us to easily deploy mpls over the integrated pond network

44:07 sure and you know i'll jump onto this is you know we've cut out the uh the middle man directly by having the pawn services

44:14 on the device you know what's kind of nice about that and what's also nice about juniper as

44:20 far as a leader in broadband network gateway services is that we're able to put uh mp bring

44:25 the mpls direct network all the way up to the pond network and being able to tunnel subscribers

44:31 through layer two circuits or evpn across the mpls network to terminate directly on the bng

44:38 and one of the key features on our bng platform is the dynamic service creation

44:43 so this means you're not manually provide provisioning subscribers on the bng you have the bng in a listen mode

44:50 where it's listening for subscribers as they come online and dynamically uh building the service

44:57 authenticating the service and provisioning the service as they come on there so you know

45:03 the neat thing about it to reiterate by having the pawn olt as part of the router and part of the

45:09 cloud metro architecture it is become it's directly integrated with the mpls network and you get all

45:17 the benefits of all the traffic engineering and everything that you do for your other services over mpls

45:25 great thank you so just to add on to that one right uh so uh the fact that

45:33 uh the pawn controller is integrated on two nodes uh junos has a bunch of services that can be utilized right so

45:40 this entire transition or the the packet transfer uh is gonna be pretty seamless right uh it's not going to cause like a

45:47 lot of problems with respect to an overlay function so it's very easy we can definitely do it the short answer is

45:53 yes

45:58 that great great to hear that um so another question is how does the

46:04 juniper or can the juniper solution support a distributed architecture for

46:09 remote locations like deploying pond in the new business park

46:15 interested in you know this question came in in a couple of different forms but the point is about distributed

46:22 architecture sure i mean i think you know by nature

46:29 with the modular olt that is a distributed architecture

46:34 we we are now putting the olt all the intelligence of it on on a single sfp

46:41 plus so instead of a single olt shelf you're distributing the olt functions across

46:47 the individual plug so you're decreasing the blast radius of the failure of a single

46:54 device but what this also means is now this olt can live outside of the

46:59 traditional network locations this could live in the basement of a building this could live in a wiring closet at the end

47:07 of a you know in a strip mall so this allows you to push these services further out and all your olt

47:14 ports don't need to be in a single location and that's what the flexibility of this modular design brings to you and

47:22 by able to connect them all together with the ip service fabric and being able to deploy those in devices that are

47:28 either you know in conditioned spaces or out in hardened locations this this gives you the flexibility to

47:34 provide those services and get into those markets you

47:42 yes definitely nothing more black on the back one

47:47 great thanks so there's uh there's a couple of questions here that i would like to to take um and it's around the

47:56 next generations of pond and and what do i see happening so one of them is what's my take on ng

48:02 pontoon so ng pontoo has only been deployed by

48:08 a few a very few operators and what it comes down to is the cost of

48:13 tunable lasers they're just expensive so from a an architectural viewpoint ng

48:22 pontu reminds me a lot of wdm pond which is that it's it's great on paper and it looks

48:30 like it has many advantages on paper the problem is the cost

48:35 and because ng-ponto has not been widely deployed it does not have any volume

48:41 behind it which means that the cost there's just not enough pressure to bring down the cost

48:47 of those tunable optics so i don't expect to see it widely deployed i don't expect to see it

48:54 gaining significant momentum um

48:59 and you'll you can see that in the omnia on the equipment forecast that yes there will be some deployed

49:06 year you know every single year but it's just not not in volume compared to

49:11 xgs pawn so what about 25 g pawn versus 50g pawn and i hate the use

49:17 of the word versus here because to me it's both so we've begun to see some 25g pawn

49:25 it's not standardized by the itu-t it has been standardized by the ieee

49:33 msa was formed around 25 g pawn and as i mentioned earlier we began to see some

49:38 deployments this year and we expect more it's not for in my opinion we will

49:46 25 gpan fills a need and and the need it comes from two places it comes from

49:53 service providers who want to be able to offer 10 gig

50:00 services even up to 15 gig services to enterprises

50:06 so there are a number of broadband service providers who have gone aggressively

50:12 to enterprises and to bring those enterprises onto the pond network

50:17 with high bandwidth services not every enterprise of course needs 10 gig or 15 gig or beyond

50:24 but with 25 gig selectively used they can offer they can offer those higher

50:30 bandwidth services the second place where we've seen interest in 25 gig

50:36 is around different types of x what i call excel transport

50:41 such as wireless backhaul and again it depends on the topology

50:47 of the 5g small cell network or what the operator expects that topology to look

50:52 like and whether they need 25 gig or not

50:57 then there's other operators who say we don't need 25 gig we're going to wait

51:03 until 50 gig becomes available

51:08 and in many of those cases those operators do not have plans to use pond for transport

51:16 and so sort of coming up a few layers in my analysis here han has been so successful

51:23 as an access technology that we're now seeing some diversity and in my opinion the

51:30 pond ecosystem can handle it and what do i mean by diversity really diversity

51:36 in applications and types of subscribers if we go back to one of my early slides

51:42 pond was the best effort ftth and fiber to the building technology 15

51:49 years ago as it's been widely accepted and very widely deployed

51:54 operators are now using it for different strategies depending upon how much fiber they have in their access

52:01 network how much competition they're facing from other operators or from

52:06 overbuilders wholesalers for example and what types of subscribers they want

52:11 to go after or have so there's a lot of different

52:17 strategies now forming around the access network and how best to

52:24 make more money on that optical disrupt distribution network so we're seeing more diversity and the

52:30 good news is that the ecosystem is at the point where it can it can handle it well

52:36 um so this is a a question another question

52:41 around slas so regarding pun sla monitoring and end-to-end service kpi monitoring would

52:49 you recommend use of wide y.1731 in general and specifically for a

52:55 network of around 300 000 subscribers so i know that this is a very specific question i don't know robert or anisha

53:02 if you if um if you want to take that one

53:10 sure

53:15 you can add on after me i think my question uh my aunt is just gonna be like it's really different right um

53:23 300k subscribers yes but then what are the other things that you're trying to do how is the deployment going to look

53:29 at so uh not a really straightforward answer but it just depends i don't know but you

53:34 have more well yeah so i mean i guess there's a couple of things that you want to look at um as far as your subscriber

53:40 services i mean obviously the the health of your your network going to the olt or

53:45 going to the access device uh is key and we are seeing a move from

53:50 using things like bfd or other protocols to using the 1731 type of monitoring

53:56 device to get better oam data out of the links in your network

54:02 that that's that's one place for that to be used uh as far as monitoring your subscriber

54:08 health like we mentioned there's a lot of statistics you have and there's also the rate of how much statistics you

54:14 gather and how much you can produce with that one of the things that we've looked at is it's really coming into the key of

54:20 what's looking at with current network deployments and where people are moving their network deployments to and it's in

54:27 automation and looking at how you can gather this data and how can you have processes

54:32 looking at this to develop you know not only is this you know getting some sort of alarm or getting

54:38 some sort of data going is this something i need to be worried about and that's one of the texts that we've

54:43 been taking with some of our applications in our paragon automation suite is to develop what is a baseline

54:50 so that you do know what is an anomaly but what is just regular standard values

54:55 and that's that's key because what may be happening in one part of the network is different than what happens

55:01 in the other so again i think going back to your question about uh using why 1731 i think

55:08 it's that's important to incorporate into your network to look at your link health look at your connections on that

55:14 side and being able to gather additional data that you would probably not traditionally have with other oam

55:20 protocols great thank you so one one quick

55:26 question which i'll take which came in after my discussion of the next generations upon is you know can these

55:33 coexist and yes they can coexist this is something that the pond ecosystem

55:39 made sure of is that there is coexistence so you do not have to

55:44 rip out anything that you've put in and you can decide where and when to upgrade both on the

55:51 network side and on the subscriber side and this is really important because what this means is that you can do

55:57 network side of upgrades before upgrading a subscriber and then only

56:08 could be upgraded or is willing to pay for a higher level a higher speed service

56:14 so we're almost um out of time so i think julia i would like to interject something right there

56:19 sure um one thing to notice you're mentioning on that is also is the platforms that are

56:25 being developed at this time uh those sfp ports are a lot of them now

56:31 are capable of both sfp 10 gig 25 gig and 50 gig so with this monitor device

56:37 it's going to mean that these will be able to live side by side in the same device as well so just wanted to add

56:43 that note there yeah thank you yeah that that's that that that's important thank you um great so

56:50 um i'd like to thank everyone for joining us today and and for submitting your questions and comments i

56:57 know we did not get to all of the questions but as i said we do have these and we'll be able to follow up

57:05 an archive version of this webinar will be available shortly so feel free to come back and view it and share it with

57:11 your colleagues a short survey will appear at the conclusion of this webinar so please take a few minutes to fill out that form

57:19 please make sure that you follow us on twitter and linkedin for information on future webinars from amdia again thank

57:25 you for joining us and we wish you a great rest of the day or a great evening depending on where you're calling in

57:31 from thank you so much

58:18 you

Show more