[Contents] [Prev] [Next] [Index] [Report an Error]


During network failure, MPLS FRR protects against link or node failure in the path of an RSVP-signaled LSP with local protection at the level of the link or node, and path protection at the level of the entire LSP.

Local Protection

Local protection includes two methods:

In the Juniper Networks implementation, one-to-one backup corresponds to the fast-reroute statement, while many-to-one (facility) backup corresponds to the link-protection and node-link-protection statements. This implementation is based on RFC 4090 Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels. Local protection is included at the MPLS and RSVP hierarchy levels, as illustrated in the sample output below. It is not recommended that you configure both types of local protection (fast reroute and facility backup) together. They are included together for illustration purposes only.

The following sample output shows the configuration of the fast-reroute statement:

[edit]
protocols {
    mpls {
        label-switched-path lsp-path-name {
            fast-reroute ;
        }
    }
}

The following sample output shows the configuration of link protection (many-to-one or facility backup):

[edit]
protocols {
    rsvp {
        interface type-fpc/pic/port {
            link-protection;
        }
    }
    mpls {
        label-switched-path lsp-path-name {
            link-protection;
        }
    }
}

The following sample output shows the configuration of node-link protection (many-to-one or facility backup):

[edit]
protocols {
    rsvp {
        interface type-fpc/pic/port {
            link-protection;
        }
    }
    mpls {
        label-switched-path lsp-path-name {
            node-link-protection;
        }
    }
}

Local protection in the JUNOS software is described as follows:

The important difference between using the fast-reroute statement and either of the link-protection statements is that the fast-reroute statement, regardless of whether a link or node fails, always protects one LSP with one detour path. The link-protection and node-link-protection statements always protect any LSPs crossing the node with one bypass path.

There are a couple of things to consider when deciding to configure fast reroute or link protection. The first is interoperability with equipment from other vendors, for example, Cisco Systems supports FRR, but does not support one-to-one backup. The second is that protection paths consume forwarding resources. In this regard, facility backup has better scaling because the protection paths are shared.

Path Protection

Complementary to local protection methods, JUNOS software supports the configuration of path protection with primary and secondary paths. By configuring path protection together with local protection, you can obtain minimum packet loss for an LSP while at the same time maintaining control over the path after the failure.

In the JUNOS software, path protection is included at the MPLS hierarchy level, as illustrated in the sample output below. The sample output shows the primary, secondary, and path statements you must include to an MPLS LSP configuration.

[edit]
protocols {
    mpls {
        label-switched-path lsp-path-name {
            primary path-name;
            secondary path-name {
                standby;
            }
        }
        path path-name {
        }
        path path-name {
        }
    }
}

Path protection in the JUNOS software is described as follows:


[Contents] [Prev] [Next] [Index] [Report an Error]