[Contents] [Prev] [Next] [Index] [Report an Error] [No Frames]


Overview

The BGP multiprotocol extensions (MP-BGP) enable BGP to support IPv4 services such as BGP multicast and BGP/MPLS virtual private networks (VPNs). BGP/MPLS VPNs are sometimes known as RFC 2547bis VPNs. Some of the applications for which you might use BGP/MPLS VPNs are to transport packets across an IP backbone, enable overlapping VPNs, operate inter-AS VPNs, enable multicast across VPNs, and provide carrier-of-carriers VPNs.

Address Families

The BGP multiprotocol extensions specify that BGP can exchange information within different types of address families. The JUNOSe BGP implementation defines the following different types of address families:

For information about specifying an address family, see Configuring BGP VPN Services.

Equal-Cost Multipath Support

Equal-cost multipath (ECMP) is a traffic load-balancing feature that enables traffic to the same destination to be distributed over multiple paths that have the same cost. BGP ECMP support for BGP/MPLS VPNs enables MPLS VPN routes to be included in the list of available equal-cost paths. You can specify that up to 16 equal-cost paths be considered.

The set of ECMP legs in a network can contain MPLS indirect next hops, either as a leg itself or pointed to by a leg. If the path to any of the MPLS indirect next hops fails, then the routing protocol begins recalculating the set of viable routes as soon as it is notified of the failure. When the recalculation has finished, the protocol then updates the routing table with the new routes.

From the time the path fails until the routing table is updated, the traffic flowing over the ECMP leg that has the failed MPLS indirect next hop is lost.

To reduce the amount of lost traffic, the failed path is quickly pruned from the ECMP set as soon as the protocol is notified of the connectivity failure. Traffic for the destination is then forwarded over the remaining equal-cost paths to the destination. When the recalculated set of routes is installed in the routing table, traffic for the destination is forwarded by means of the new route.

ECMP sets can have an MPLS indirect next hop as one of the legs in the following scenarios:

Consider the simple ECMP scenario for a BGP/MPLS VPN shown in Figure 67.


Figure 67: ECMP BGP/MPLS VPN Scenario

With respect to PE 1, this network has an ECMP set of two equal-cost legs for the VPN prefix of CE 2, 192.168.0.1/32:

The details of these routes are displayed by the following command:

host1:pe1:pe1-ce1#show ip route 192.168.0.1 detail
192.168.0.1/32 Type: Bgp Distance: 200 Metric: 0 Tag: 0 Class: 0
  MPLS next-hop: 741, ECMP next-hop, leg count 2
    MPLS next-hop: 389, label 17, VPN traffic, resolved by MPLS next-hop 376
      MPLS next-hop: 376, resolved by MPLS next-hop 385, peer 10.3.3.3
        MPLS next-hop: 385, label 24 on GigabitEthernet1/1/0.2
(ip19000002.mpls.ip [V:pe1]), nbr 10.3.2.2
    MPLS next-hop: 740, label 18, VPN traffic, resolved by MPLS next-hop 729
      MPLS next-hop: 729, resolved by MPLS next-hop 737, peer 10.2.2.2
        MPLS next-hop: 737, label 27 on GigabitEthernet1/1/0.1
(ip19000001.mpls.ip [V:pe1]), nbr 10.3.1.2

If the connection to PE 2 fails, BGP marks the MPLS next hop 729 as a failed indirect next hop as soon as BGP is notified of the loss of connectivity. However, some traffic continues to be forwarded to CE 2 through PE 2; this traffic is lost. BGP quickly prunes the failed route from the FIB, stopping this traffic loss, and then recalculates the routes to CE 2. During this period, traffic for CE 2 is forwarded only through PE 3. When the new routes are installed in the FIB, traffic is forwarded to CE 2 by means of the newly installed route.

BGP/MPLS VPN Components

If you have specified the VPN-IPv4 address family, you can configure virtual private networks across an IP backbone. BGP carries routing information for the network and MPLS labels, whereas MPLS transports the data traffic. Figure 68 shows a typical scenario.

The service provider backbone comprises two types of routers:

PE routers are situated at the edge of the service provider core and connect directly to customer sites. These routers must run BGP-4, including the BGP/MPLS VPN extensions. They must also be able to originate and terminate MPLS LSPs. (See Chapter 2, Configuring MPLS, for more information.)

P routers connect directly to PE routers or other P routers and do not connect directly to customer sites. These routers must be able to switch MPLS LSPs—that is, they function as MPLS label-switching routers (LSRs) and might function as label edge routers (LERs). Running BGP-4 on the P routers is not necessary to be able to exchange routing information for VPNs. You might run BGP-4 on the core routers for other reasons, such as exchanging routing information for the public Internet or implementing route reflectors. The P routes do not need to contain any information about customer sites.

PE routers communicate with customer sites through a direct connection to a customer edge (CE) device that sits at the edge of the customer site. The CE device can be a single host, a switch, or, most typically, a router. When the CE device is a router, it is a routing peer of all directly connected PE routers, but it is not a routing peer of CE routers at any other site. The link between the CE router and the PE router can employ any type of encapsulation. Using MPLS is not necessary. In Figure 68, each PE router connects to multiple CE routers and at least one P router. Although only one customer site is shown, each CE router lies within a customer site.


Figure 68: BGP/MPLS VPN Scenario

A customer site is a network that can communicate with other networks in the same VPN. A customer site can belong to more than one VPN. Two sites can exchange IP packets with each other only if they have at least one VPN in common.

Each customer site that is connected to a particular PE router is also associated with a VPN routing and forwarding instance (VRF). As shown in Figure 69, each VRF has its own forwarding table distinct from that of other VRFs and from the virtual router's global forwarding table.


Figure 69: BGP/MPLS VPN Components

A given VRF's forwarding table includes only routes to sites that have at least one VPN in common with the site that is associated with the VRF. For example, in Figure 69, the forwarding table in VRF B stores routes only to sites that are members of at least one of the VPNs to which Customer Site 3 belongs.

VRFs exist within the context of a virtual router (VR). A given virtual router can have zero or more VRFs, in addition to its global routing table (which is not associated with any VPN, CE router, or customer site). A router can support up to 1000 forwarding tables; that is, up to a combined total of 1000 VRs and VRFs.

You assign one or more interfaces or subinterfaces to a given VRF. If multiple customer sites are members of the same set of VPNs, they can share a VRF—that is, you do not need to create a specific VRF for each customer site. In Figure 69, Customer Sites 1 and 2 share VRF A; both sites belong to the same set of VPNs. The router looks up a packet's destination in the VRF associated with the interface on which the packet is received. The VRFs are populated by BGP while it learns routes from the VPN. If a customer site is a member of multiple VPNs, the routes learned from all those VPNs populate the VRF associated with the site.

VPN-IPv4 Addresses

Because each VPN has its own private address space, the same IP address might be used in several VPNs. To provide for more than one route to a given IPv4 address (each route unique to a single VPN), BGP/MPLS VPNs use route distinguishers (RDs) followed by an IPv4 address to create unique VPN-IPv4 addresses. A route can have only one RD.

The RD contains no routing information; it simply enables you to create unique VPN-IPv4 address prefixes. You can specify the RD in either of the following ways:

You can create unique VPN-IPv4 addresses by assigning a unique RD to each VRF in your network. However, the optimal strategy depends on the configuration of your network. For example, if each VRF always belongs to only one VPN, you might use a single RD for all VRFs that belong to a particular VPN.

Route Targets

A route-target extended community, or route target, is a type of BGP extended community that you use to define VPN membership. The route target appears in a field in the update messages associated with VPN-IPv4.

You create route-target import lists and route-target export lists for each VRF. The route targets that you place in a route target export list are attached to every route advertised to other PE routers. When a PE router receives a route from another PE router, it compares the route targets attached to each route against the route-target import list defined for each of its VRFs. If any route target attached to a route matches the import list for a VRF, then the route is imported to that VRF. If no route target matches the import list, then the route is rejected for that VRF.

Depending on your network configuration, the import and export lists may be identical. Typically, you do the following:

For more complicated scenarios—for example, hub-and-spoke VPNs—the route-target import list and the route-target export list might not be identical.

A route-target import list is applied before any inbound routing policy (route map) is applied. If an inbound route map contains a set extcommunity clause, the clause replaces all extended communities in the received route. BGP applies the default route-target export list associated with the VRF if the route does not have any route-target extended-community attributes after the inbound policy has been applied. On the other hand, the default export list is not applied if either a valid route-target export list is received or the inbound route map sets one or more route targets.

Distribution of Routes and Labels with BGP

The extensions to BGP include enhancements to update messages that enable them to carry the route distinguishers, route-target extended-community information, and MPLS labels required for BGP/MPLS VPNs.

Consider the simple example shown in Figure 70. The customer edge devices are connected with their associated provider edge routers by external BGP sessions (CE 1–PE 1 and CE 3–PE 2). PE 1 and PE 2 are BGP peers by an internal BGP session across the service provider core in AS 777.

In this example, the PE routers run EBGP to the CE routers to do the following:


Figure 70: Route and Label Distribution

Rather than running EBGP between the PE routers and the CE routers, you can do either of the following:

In this example the two customer sites use different AS numbers, which simplifies configuration. Alternatively, the same AS numbers can be used.

Customer site 1 has two networks that need to be reachable from customer site 3—10.3.0.0/16 and 10.12.0.0/16—and uses BGP to announce these prefixes to PE 1. CE 1 uses a standard BGP update message as shown in Figure 71 to carry this and additional information. CE 1 is withdrawing prefix 10.1.0.0/16. CE 1 specifies its own address as the next hop; 10.4.1.1 is from the private address space of VPN A.

PE 1 passes the advertisement along the backbone through an IBGP session, but uses MP-BGP rather than standard BGP-4. Consequently, PE 1 uses an extended BGP update message, which is different in format from the standard message, as shown in Figure 71.

The extended update uses different attributes for some of the advertised information. For example it carries the advertised prefixes in the MP-Reach-NLRI attribute instead of the NLRI attribute. Similarly, it uses the MP-Unreach-NLRI attribute for withdrawn routes rather than the withdrawn-routes attribute.

PE 1 advertises the customer site addresses by prepending information to the addresses as advertised by CE 1, thus creating labeled VPN-IPv4 prefixes. The prepended information consists of a route distinguisher and an MPLS label.

Because the CE router uses IPv4 addresses from the VPN's private address space, these addresses can be duplicated in other VPNs to which PE 1 is attached. PE 1 associates a route distinguisher with each IPv4 address to create a globally unique address. In this example, the RD consists of the AS that PE 1 belongs to and a number that PE 1 assigns. The RD is prepended immediately before the IPv4 address.

PE routers assign MPLS labels to each VRF. In this example, the label for the VRF associated with customer site 1 is 16. The MPLS label is prepended immediately before the route distinguisher.

NOTE: The explicit null label is prepended only to routes that are being withdrawn in the MP-REACH-NLRI attribute.


Some non–E-series implementations allocate a separate label for each prefix. By default, the E-series router generates one label for all BGP routes advertised by the VRF, thus reducing the number of stacked labels to be managed. The ip mpls forwarding-mode label-switched command enables you to have the router generate a label for each different FEC pointed to by a BGP route in a given VRF. However, some routes always receive a per-VRF label; see Creating Labels per FEC for more information.


Figure 71: Standard and Extended BGP Update Messages

Using the next-hop-self option on PE 1 causes PE 1 to set the next-hop attribute to its own address, 172.32.12.1. Doing so is necessary because the next hop provided by CE 1 is from VPN A's private address space and has no meaning in the service provider core. In addition, PE 2 must have PE 1's address so that it can establish an LSP back to PE 1. The next-hop address must also be carried in the MP-Reach-NLRI attribute, according to MP-BGP.

The extended update also has the extended-communities attribute, which identifies the VPN to which the routes are advertised. In this example, the route target is 777:1001, identifying VPN A.


[Contents] [Prev] [Next] [Index] [Report an Error] [No Frames]