Table 11 compares the PIC
families with regard to major CoS features. Note that this table reflects
the ability to perform the CoS function at the PIC level and not on the system as a whole.
Table 11: CoS Features of PIC Families Compared
Feature:
M320/T-series
IQ PICs
IQ2 PICs
Enhanced IQ PICs
BA classification
Yes
–
–
Yes
ToS bit rewrites
Yes
Yes, for IEEE bits only
Yes, for IEEE bits only
–
Ingress ToS bit rewrites
–
–
–
Yes
Hierarchical policers
–
–
–
Yes
Scheduling on the PIC Families
Table 12 compares the PIC families
with regard to scheduling abilities or features. Note that this table
reflects the ability to perform the function at the PIC
level and not necessarily on the system as a whole.
Table 12: Scheduling on PIC Families Compared
Scheduling Feature:
M320/T-series
IQ PICs
IQ2 PICs
Enhanced IQ PICs
Per–unit scheduling
–
Yes
Yes
Yes
Physical port and logical unit shaping
–
–
Yes
Yes
Guaranteed rate or peak rate support
–
–
Yes
Yes, at the logical unit
Excess rate support
–
–
–
Yes, at the logical unit
Shared scheduler support
–
–
Yes
–
Schedulers on the PIC Families
Table 13 compares the PIC families
with regard to scheduler statements or features. Note that this table
reflects the ability to perform the scheduler function at
the PIC level and not necessarily on the system as a whole.
Table 13: Schedulers on PIC Families Compared
Scheduler Statement or Feature:
M320/T-series
IQ PICs
IQ2 PICs
Enhanced IQ PICs
Exact
Yes
Yes
–
Yes
Rate-limit
–
–
Yes
Yes
Traffic shaping
–
–
–
Yes
More than one high-priority queue
Yes
Yes
–
Yes
Excess priority or sharing
–
–
–
Yes
Queuing Parameters for the PIC Families
Table 14 compares the PIC families
with regard to queuing parameters and features.
Table 14: Queue
Parameters on PIC Families Compared
Queuing Statement or Feature:
M320/T-series
IQ PICs
IQ2 PICs
Enhanced IQ PICs
Maximum number of queues
8
8 on M320 or T-series routing platforms, 4 on
M7, M10, M20 routers